Effects of Implementing Scholastic Literacy Pro, a Program Aimed at Facilitating Independent Reading and Utilizing Data to Tailor Instruction
Keywords:
Proficiency Level, Reading, Scholastic Literacy ProgramAbstract
This study evaluated the reading competence levels of Grade 1 pupils at St. Paul University Surigao utilizing Scholastic Literacy Pro. The research utilized a one-group pretest-posttest methodology to evaluate the effects of Scholastic Literacy Pro, a program aimed at facilitating independent reading and equipping educators with data for personalized instruction. The researchers administered pre- and post-assessments to evaluate the students' advancement in reading competency, classifying their scores into advanced, proficient, basic, and below basic categories. The results indicated that competence levels were primarily below basic, with only a minor minority achieving basic, proficient, or advanced levels. No substantial differences were identified when categorized by section, gender, prior educational institution, or type of school. A notable disparity was observed between pre- and post-test results, signifying that the instructional reading intervention exerted a beneficial effect. The study advocates for targeted instructional strategies to enhance reading proficiency, continuous professional development for teachers on effective methodologies and progress monitoring, and the augmentation of teachers' knowledge and skills to accommodate diverse learner requirements. By adopting these recommendations, the school can further enhance reading competency levels among Grade 1 children.
References
A. A. Grant, M. A. Cook, and S. M. Ross, “The Impacts of i-Ready Personalized Instruction on Student Reading Achievement among Striving Learners.,” Center for Research and Reform in Education, 2023.
M. V Porche, D. H. Pallante, and C. E. Snow, “Professional development for reading achievement: Results from the collaborative language and literacy instruction project (CLLIP),” Elem. Sch. J., vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 649–671, 2012.
C. M. Connor, “Using technology and assessment to personalize instruction: Preventing reading problems,” Prevention Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 89–99, 2019.
B. Göldağ, “An investigation of the relationship between university students’ digital burnout levels and perceived stress levels,” Journal of Learning and Teaching in Digital Age, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 90–98, 2022.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arpilled Navarro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.